History                                            | introduction | drivers for high rise living | reasons for decline |


 

Drivers for high rise living

 

There were many reasons for the design and construction of high-rise towers in post war UK as mentioned in the section above. Some of the main driving forces that enabled the idea of high-rise living to be implemented are seen below.

1- Structure & Lifts
With the advent of advanced building technology using materials such as steel and concrete it was possible to build high quality tower blocks with ease. The structural challenges of building high that were previously insurmountable were a non-issue because of the availability of modern building technology. In any case the tower blocks that were proposed in the UK were of medium height and did not require the sophistication required for the commercial buildings built in Chicago and other places during the 19th Century.

With the increase in height, vertical circulation became necessary. . The lift technology was an outcome of the industrial revolution and it made going higher possible and was an important component of building towers. The reliance on mechanical transportation in tower blocks became a problem because of a lack of adequate maintenance.

2- Political situation
The emergence of the residential tower blocks typology didn’t have a smooth beginning since this was the first time that such dwellings were implemented in the country. Once the tower blocks started to appear and their technical problems were dealt with, local politicians encouraged and supported the implementation of this new typology. The reconstruction project had a dual benefit to business and society at the time since it benefited the disadvantaged in that they had better living conditions as well as the economy due to large scale building activity.

3- Procurement
With the increase in demand and construction activity, large trades and projects were commissioned to contractors. Architects and local authorities traditionally took the role of supervising and guiding the project, however, the large-scale projects could be said to have started the trend towards ‘design and build’ procurement for residential accommodation.


4- The new dwellings and its inhabitants
People were happy to move in to their flats in new modern buildings with innovative equipments and fabric. Everything presented a bright new life from the type of building that they were living in to the new conveniences that it offered. The new dwellings incorporated innovative systems whose performance was hard to predict at first, when they were being designed and built.

5- Production vs. Demand
From 1960 onwards, after the inhabitants were used to their new environment (dwellings) and lived with/used what was considered innovative systems/fixtures, appliances and fabric, questions were raised about the socio-psychological impact of the choices that were made.

In the mid 1960’s the relation between providers and users was straightforward. At first the users used to deal with objects as intended by providers. Later they started modifying them according to experience and need. From 1960s onward the users wanted to contribute in the choice and started to take the role of designers and providers.

6- The change of users with time

In the 1940s during their rise, the tower blocks, being innovative constructions appearing in the skyline, were praised and people were happy to live in them, while houses and tenements were condemned. The high-rise flats were introduced as high and middle class dwellings, which during the following century became dwellings for working class people, acquiring an image much different from the expected.


| introduction | drivers for high rise living | reasons for decline |

 

Project partners: | Price Myers: Sustainability | Battle McCarthy | Architype | STBI | Franklin Andrews |

© 2004 Price & Myers         ...................................................                                     Contact: sustainability@pricemyers.com